Qwen3.5-27B vs GLM 4.6V

Qwen3.5-27B at $0.224 in and $1.79 out and GLM 4.6V at $0.345 in and $1.03 out — per million tokens, from the same wallet.

Qwen3.5-27B

Qwen

0.26¢

for a client proposal

$0.224 in · $1.79 out / 1M

262K context · released 5 months ago

Full page →

GLM 4.6V

Z.ai

0.26¢

for a client proposal

$0.345 in · $1.03 out / 1M

131K context · released December 2025

Full page →

Asking all both at once — identical prompt, identical context — costs about 0.51¢ for a typical client proposal.

At a glance

Cheapest input: Qwen3.5-27B at $0.224 per million tokens.
Cheapest output: GLM 4.6V at $1.03 per million tokens.
Largest context: Qwen3.5-27B at 262K tokens — about 370 pages.

Cost per task

Estimated totals at the rates above. Solid bar is input, lighter bar is output.

Quick code fix

2K in · 500 out

Qwen3.5-27B

0.13¢

GLM 4.6V

0.12¢

Draft a client proposal from notes

5K in · 800 out

Qwen3.5-27B

0.26¢

GLM 4.6V

0.26¢

Context-heavy session (Alyph workspace)

155K in · 4K out

Qwen3.5-27B

4.2¢

GLM 4.6V

needs 155K ctx

Analyze a 50-page legal contract

35K in · 1K out

Qwen3.5-27B

0.96¢

GLM 4.6V

1.3¢

Large architecture refactor

250K in · 3K out

Qwen3.5-27B

$0.06

GLM 4.6V

needs 250K ctx

Solid part of each bar is input tokens, the lighter part is output. Models that don’t fit a task are marked instead of priced.

Cost vs Token Amount

Drag the slider to adjust the split between input and output workload.

80% Input20% Output

Qwen3.5-27B

GLM 4.6V

Adjust the ratio slider to change how output tokens influence the final price for equivalent workloads.

Pricing

Qwen3.5-27B

GLM 4.6V

Input / 1M tokens

$0.224

$0.345

Output / 1M tokens

$1.79

$1.03

Cached input / 1M

—

$0.063

Specs

Qwen3.5-27B

GLM 4.6V

Provider

Qwen

Z.ai

Released

5 months ago

December 2025

Context window

262K

131K

Max output

66K

33K

Input

Text, Images, and Video

Images, Text, and Video

Output

Text

Reasoning

Shows its thinking

Knowledge cutoff

—

Try it with real numbers

2K tokens in · 500 tokens out.

Qwen3.5-27B

Qwen

0.13¢

for this task

33% input · 67% output

Full pricing →

GLM 4.6V

Z.ai

0.12¢

for this task

57% input · 43% output

Full pricing →

All 2, same prompt and context: 0.26¢. That is the entire cost of the comparison.

Your $5 welcome credit covers about 1,958 of these.

Which should you pick?

For long documents, Qwen3.5-27B has the largest context window here — 262K tokens.

On price, GLM 4.6V is the cheapest of the two on a typical task, at about 0.26¢.

Or don’t pick. Send the identical prompt to all both, read the answers side by side, and keep the winner. How to run a fair bake-off →

Qwen3.5-27B pricing →GLM 4.6V pricing →Add Lyria 3 Clip Preview Add Grok 4.20

Questions, answered

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-27B or GLM 4.6V?

On a typical client proposal (5K tokens in, 800 out): GLM 4.6V at 0.26¢; Qwen3.5-27B at 0.26¢. Long prompts can change the order when long-context rates apply.

Which has the largest context window?

Qwen3.5-27B — 262K tokens, about 370 pages.

Can I run Qwen3.5-27B and GLM 4.6V side by side on Alyph?

Yes — that is what Alyph is built for: the identical prompt with identical context to all 2, answers rendered side by side, billed from one wallet. This exact combination costs about 0.51¢ for a typical task.

Ask both at once

Identical prompt, identical context, answers side by side — about 0.51¢ for a typical client proposal. Free to start, with $5 of credit.