All models

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B at $0.058 in and $0.230 out and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 at $0.055 in and $0.222 out — per million tokens, from the same wallet.

N

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

NVIDIA

0.05¢

for a client proposal

$0.058 in · $0.230 out / 1M

262K context · released December 2025

Full page →
Q

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Qwen

0.05¢

for a client proposal

$0.055 in · $0.222 out / 1M

128K context · released July 2025

Full page →

Asking all both at once — identical prompt, identical context — costs about 0.09¢ for a typical client proposal.

At a glance

  • Cheapest input: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 at $0.055 per million tokens.
  • Cheapest output: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 at $0.222 per million tokens.
  • Largest context: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B at 262K tokens — about 370 pages.

Cost per task

Estimated totals at the rates above. Solid bar is input, lighter bar is output.

Quick code fix

2K in · 500 out
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
0.02¢
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
0.02¢

Draft a client proposal from notes

5K in · 800 out
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
0.05¢
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
0.05¢

Context-heavy session (Alyph workspace)

155K in · 4K out
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
0.98¢
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
needs 155K ctx

Analyze a 50-page legal contract

35K in · 1K out
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
0.22¢
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
0.22¢

Large architecture refactor

250K in · 3K out
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
1.5¢
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
needs 250K ctx

Solid part of each bar is input tokens, the lighter part is output. Models that don’t fit a task are marked instead of priced.

Cost vs Token Amount

Drag the slider to adjust the split between input and output workload.

80% Input20% Output
free4.6¢$0.090 tokens250k500k750k1000k
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Adjust the ratio slider to change how output tokens influence the final price for equivalent workloads.

Pricing

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input / 1M tokens
$0.058
$0.055
Output / 1M tokens
$0.230
$0.222
Cached input / 1M
$0.035

Specs

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Provider
Released
December 2025
July 2025
Context window
262K
128K
Max output
262K
32K
Input
Text
Text
Output
Text
Text
Reasoning
Shows its thinking
Answers directly
Knowledge cutoff
2025-06-30

Try it with real numbers

2K tokens in · 500 tokens out.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

NVIDIA

0.02¢

for this task

50% input · 50% output

Full pricing →

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Qwen

0.02¢

for this task

50% input · 50% output

Full pricing →

All 2, same prompt and context: 0.05¢. That is the entire cost of the comparison.

Your $5 welcome credit covers about 11,077 of these.

Which should you pick?

For long documents, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has the largest context window here — 262K tokens.

On price, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is the cheapest of the two on a typical task, at about 0.05¢.

If you want to watch the model think, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B shows reasoning; the other answers directly.

Or don’t pick. Send the identical prompt to all both, read the answers side by side, and keep the winner. How to run a fair bake-off →

Questions, answered

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

On a typical client proposal (5K tokens in, 800 out): Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 at 0.05¢; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B at 0.05¢. Long prompts can change the order when long-context rates apply.

Which has the largest context window?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B — 262K tokens, about 370 pages.

Can I run Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 side by side on Alyph?

Yes — that is what Alyph is built for: the identical prompt with identical context to all 2, answers rendered side by side, billed from one wallet. This exact combination costs about 0.09¢ for a typical task.

Ask both at once

Identical prompt, identical context, answers side by side — about 0.09¢ for a typical client proposal. Free to start, with $5 of credit.