All models

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Llama 4 Maverick at $0.230 in and $0.920 out and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking at $0.172 in and $1.38 out — per million tokens, from the same wallet.

M

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta

0.19¢

for a client proposal

$0.230 in · $0.920 out / 1M

1.05M context · released April 2025

Full page →
Q

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Qwen

0.2¢

for a client proposal

$0.172 in · $1.38 out / 1M

262K context · released September 2025

Full page →

Asking all both at once — identical prompt, identical context — costs about 0.39¢ for a typical client proposal.

At a glance

  • Cheapest input: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking at $0.172 per million tokens.
  • Cheapest output: Llama 4 Maverick at $0.920 per million tokens.
  • Largest context: Llama 4 Maverick at 1.05M tokens — about 1,500 pages.

Cost per task

Estimated totals at the rates above. Solid bar is input, lighter bar is output.

Quick code fix

2K in · 500 out
Llama 4 Maverick
0.09¢
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
0.1¢

Draft a client proposal from notes

5K in · 800 out
Llama 4 Maverick
0.19¢
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
0.2¢

Context-heavy session (Alyph workspace)

155K in · 4K out
Llama 4 Maverick
3.9¢
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
3.2¢

Analyze a 50-page legal contract

35K in · 1K out
Llama 4 Maverick
0.9¢
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
0.74¢

Large architecture refactor

250K in · 3K out
Llama 4 Maverick
$0.06
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
4.7¢

Solid part of each bar is input tokens, the lighter part is output. Models that don’t fit a task are marked instead of priced.

Cost vs Token Amount

Drag the slider to adjust the split between input and output workload.

80% Input20% Output
free$0.21$0.410 tokens250k500k750k1000k
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Adjust the ratio slider to change how output tokens influence the final price for equivalent workloads.

Pricing

Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input / 1M tokens
$0.230
$0.172
Output / 1M tokens
$0.920
$1.38

Specs

Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Provider
Released
April 2025
September 2025
Context window
1.05M
262K
Max output
16K
262K
Input
Text and Images
Text
Output
Text
Text
Reasoning
Answers directly
Shows its thinking
Knowledge cutoff
2024-08-31
2025-09-30

Try it with real numbers

2K tokens in · 500 tokens out.

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta

0.09¢

for this task

50% input · 50% output

Full pricing →

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Qwen

0.1¢

for this task

33% input · 67% output

Full pricing →

All 2, same prompt and context: 0.2¢. That is the entire cost of the comparison.

Your $5 welcome credit covers about 2,557 of these.

Which should you pick?

For long documents, Llama 4 Maverick has the largest context window here — 1.05M tokens.

On price, Llama 4 Maverick is the cheapest of the two on a typical task, at about 0.19¢.

For images or files, Llama 4 Maverick can read them directly; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is text-only.

If you want to watch the model think, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking shows reasoning; the other answers directly.

Or don’t pick. Send the identical prompt to all both, read the answers side by side, and keep the winner. How to run a fair bake-off →

Questions, answered

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

On a typical client proposal (5K tokens in, 800 out): Llama 4 Maverick at 0.19¢; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking at 0.2¢. Long prompts can change the order when long-context rates apply.

Which has the largest context window?

Llama 4 Maverick — 1.05M tokens, about 1,500 pages.

Can I run Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking side by side on Alyph?

Yes — that is what Alyph is built for: the identical prompt with identical context to all 2, answers rendered side by side, billed from one wallet. This exact combination costs about 0.39¢ for a typical task.

Ask both at once

Identical prompt, identical context, answers side by side — about 0.39¢ for a typical client proposal. Free to start, with $5 of credit.