Ling-2.6-flash vs Mistral Nemo

Ling-2.6-flash at $0.011 in and $0.035 out and Mistral Nemo at $0.022 in and $0.035 out — per million tokens, from the same wallet.

Ling-2.6-flash

Inclusionai

0.01¢

for a client proposal

$0.011 in · $0.035 out / 1M

262K context · released 4 months ago

Full page →

Mistral Nemo

Mistral AI

0.01¢

for a client proposal

$0.022 in · $0.035 out / 1M

131K context · released July 2024

Full page →

Asking all both at once — identical prompt, identical context — costs about 0.02¢ for a typical client proposal.

At a glance

Cheapest input: Ling-2.6-flash at $0.011 per million tokens.
Largest context: Ling-2.6-flash at 262K tokens — about 370 pages.

Cost per task

Estimated totals at the rates above. Solid bar is input, lighter bar is output.

Quick code fix

2K in · 500 out

Ling-2.6-flash

0¢

Mistral Nemo

0.01¢

Draft a client proposal from notes

5K in · 800 out

Ling-2.6-flash

0.01¢

Mistral Nemo

0.01¢

Context-heavy session (Alyph workspace)

155K in · 4K out

Ling-2.6-flash

0.19¢

Mistral Nemo

needs 155K ctx

Analyze a 50-page legal contract

35K in · 1K out

Ling-2.6-flash

0.04¢

Mistral Nemo

0.08¢

Large architecture refactor

250K in · 3K out

Ling-2.6-flash

0.3¢

Mistral Nemo

needs 250K ctx

Solid part of each bar is input tokens, the lighter part is output. Models that don’t fit a task are marked instead of priced.

Cost vs Token Amount

Drag the slider to adjust the split between input and output workload.

80% Input20% Output

Ling-2.6-flash

Mistral Nemo

Adjust the ratio slider to change how output tokens influence the final price for equivalent workloads.

Pricing

Ling-2.6-flash

Mistral Nemo

Input / 1M tokens

$0.011

$0.022

Output / 1M tokens

$0.035

Cached input / 1M

$0.0023

—

Specs

Ling-2.6-flash

Mistral Nemo

Provider

Inclusionai

Mistral AI

Released

4 months ago

July 2024

Context window

262K

131K

Max output

33K

16K

Input

Text

Output

Text

Reasoning

Answers directly

Knowledge cutoff

—

2024-04-30

Try it with real numbers

2K tokens in · 500 tokens out.

Ling-2.6-flash

Inclusionai

0¢

for this task

57% input · 43% output

Full pricing →

Mistral Nemo

Mistral AI

0.01¢

for this task

72% input · 28% output

Full pricing →

All 2, same prompt and context: 0.01¢. That is the entire cost of the comparison.

Your $5 welcome credit covers about 49,407 of these.

Which should you pick?

For long documents, Ling-2.6-flash has the largest context window here — 262K tokens.

On price, Ling-2.6-flash is the cheapest of the two on a typical task, at about 0.01¢.

Or don’t pick. Send the identical prompt to all both, read the answers side by side, and keep the winner. How to run a fair bake-off →

Ling-2.6-flash pricing →Mistral Nemo pricing →Add Lyria 3 Clip Preview Add Grok 4.20

Questions, answered

Which is cheaper, Ling-2.6-flash or Mistral Nemo?

On a typical client proposal (5K tokens in, 800 out): Ling-2.6-flash at 0.01¢; Mistral Nemo at 0.01¢. Long prompts can change the order when long-context rates apply.

Which has the largest context window?

Ling-2.6-flash — 262K tokens, about 370 pages.

Can I run Ling-2.6-flash and Mistral Nemo side by side on Alyph?

Yes — that is what Alyph is built for: the identical prompt with identical context to all 2, answers rendered side by side, billed from one wallet. This exact combination costs about 0.02¢ for a typical task.

Ask both at once

Identical prompt, identical context, answers side by side — about 0.02¢ for a typical client proposal. Free to start, with $5 of credit.