UI-TARS 7B vs Qwen3 32B

UI-TARS 7B at $0.115 in and $0.230 out and Qwen3 32B at $0.092 in and $0.322 out — per million tokens, from the same wallet.

UI-TARS 7B

ByteDance

0.08¢

for a client proposal

$0.115 in · $0.230 out / 1M

128K context · released July 2025

Full page →

Qwen3 32B

Qwen

0.07¢

for a client proposal

$0.092 in · $0.322 out / 1M

41K context · released April 2025

Full page →

Asking all both at once — identical prompt, identical context — costs about 0.15¢ for a typical client proposal.

At a glance

Cheapest input: Qwen3 32B at $0.092 per million tokens.
Cheapest output: UI-TARS 7B at $0.230 per million tokens.
Largest context: UI-TARS 7B at 128K tokens — about 180 pages.

Cost per task

Estimated totals at the rates above. Solid bar is input, lighter bar is output.

Quick code fix

2K in · 500 out

UI-TARS 7B

0.03¢

Qwen3 32B

0.03¢

Draft a client proposal from notes

5K in · 800 out

UI-TARS 7B

0.08¢

Qwen3 32B

0.07¢

Context-heavy session (Alyph workspace)

155K in · 4K out

UI-TARS 7B

needs 155K ctx

Qwen3 32B

needs 155K ctx

Analyze a 50-page legal contract

35K in · 1K out

UI-TARS 7B

0.43¢

Qwen3 32B

0.35¢

Large architecture refactor

250K in · 3K out

UI-TARS 7B

needs 250K ctx

Qwen3 32B

needs 250K ctx

Solid part of each bar is input tokens, the lighter part is output. Models that don’t fit a task are marked instead of priced.

Cost vs Token Amount

Drag the slider to adjust the split between input and output workload.

80% Input20% Output

UI-TARS 7B

Qwen3 32B

Adjust the ratio slider to change how output tokens influence the final price for equivalent workloads.

Pricing

UI-TARS 7B

Qwen3 32B

Input / 1M tokens

$0.115

$0.092

Output / 1M tokens

$0.230

$0.322

Cached input / 1M

$0.115

—

Specs

UI-TARS 7B

Qwen3 32B

Provider

ByteDance

Qwen

Released

July 2025

April 2025

Context window

128K

41K

Max output

16K

Input

Images and Text

Text

Output

Text

Reasoning

Answers directly

Shows its thinking

Knowledge cutoff

2025-01-31

2025-03-31

Try it with real numbers

2K tokens in · 500 tokens out.

UI-TARS 7B

ByteDance

0.03¢

for this task

67% input · 33% output

Full pricing →

Qwen3 32B

Qwen

0.03¢

for this task

53% input · 47% output

Full pricing →

All 2, same prompt and context: 0.07¢. That is the entire cost of the comparison.

Your $5 welcome credit covers about 7,246 of these.

Which should you pick?

For long documents, UI-TARS 7B has the largest context window here — 128K tokens.

On price, Qwen3 32B is the cheapest of the two on a typical task, at about 0.07¢.

For images or files, UI-TARS 7B can read them directly; Qwen3 32B is text-only.

If you want to watch the model think, Qwen3 32B shows reasoning; the other answers directly.

Or don’t pick. Send the identical prompt to all both, read the answers side by side, and keep the winner. How to run a fair bake-off →

UI-TARS 7B pricing →Qwen3 32B pricing →Add Lyria 3 Clip Preview Add Grok 4.20

Questions, answered

Which is cheaper, UI-TARS 7B or Qwen3 32B?

On a typical client proposal (5K tokens in, 800 out): Qwen3 32B at 0.07¢; UI-TARS 7B at 0.08¢. Long prompts can change the order when long-context rates apply.

Which has the largest context window?

UI-TARS 7B — 128K tokens, about 180 pages.

Can I run UI-TARS 7B and Qwen3 32B side by side on Alyph?

Yes — that is what Alyph is built for: the identical prompt with identical context to all 2, answers rendered side by side, billed from one wallet. This exact combination costs about 0.15¢ for a typical task.

Ask both at once

Identical prompt, identical context, answers side by side — about 0.15¢ for a typical client proposal. Free to start, with $5 of credit.