Trinity Large Thinking vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

Trinity Large Thinking at $0.253 in and $0.978 out and Qwen3 Coder Flash at $0.224 in and $1.12 out — per million tokens, from the same wallet.

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee AI

0.2¢

for a client proposal

$0.253 in · $0.978 out / 1M

262K context · released 4 months ago

Full page →

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Qwen

0.2¢

for a client proposal

$0.224 in · $1.12 out / 1M

1M context · released September 2025

Full page →

Asking all both at once — identical prompt, identical context — costs about 0.41¢ for a typical client proposal.

At a glance

Cheapest input: Qwen3 Coder Flash at $0.224 per million tokens.
Cheapest output: Trinity Large Thinking at $0.978 per million tokens.
Largest context: Qwen3 Coder Flash at 1M tokens — about 1,400 pages.

Cost per task

Estimated totals at the rates above. Solid bar is input, lighter bar is output.

Quick code fix

2K in · 500 out

Trinity Large Thinking

0.1¢

Qwen3 Coder Flash

0.1¢

Draft a client proposal from notes

5K in · 800 out

Trinity Large Thinking

0.2¢

Qwen3 Coder Flash

0.2¢

Context-heavy session (Alyph workspace)

155K in · 4K out

Trinity Large Thinking

4.3¢

Qwen3 Coder Flash

$0.10

Long-context rate applied at this input size.

Analyze a 50-page legal contract

35K in · 1K out

Trinity Large Thinking

0.98¢

Qwen3 Coder Flash

1.5¢

Long-context rate applied at this input size.

Large architecture refactor

250K in · 3K out

Trinity Large Thinking

$0.07

Qwen3 Coder Flash

$0.16

Long-context rate applied at this input size.

Solid part of each bar is input tokens, the lighter part is output. Models that don’t fit a task are marked instead of priced.

Cost vs Token Amount

Drag the slider to adjust the split between input and output workload.

80% Input20% Output

Trinity Large Thinking

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Adjust the ratio slider to change how output tokens influence the final price for equivalent workloads.

Pricing

Trinity Large Thinking

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Input / 1M tokens

$0.253

$0.224

Output / 1M tokens

$0.978

$1.12

Cached input / 1M

$0.069

$0.045

Specs

Trinity Large Thinking

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Provider

Arcee AI

Qwen

Released

4 months ago

September 2025

Context window

262K

Max output

262K

66K

Input

Text

Output

Text

Reasoning

Shows its thinking

Answers directly

Knowledge cutoff

—

2025-06-30

Try it with real numbers

2K tokens in · 500 tokens out.

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee AI

0.1¢

for this task

51% input · 49% output

Full pricing →

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Qwen

0.1¢

for this task

44% input · 56% output

Full pricing →

All 2, same prompt and context: 0.2¢. That is the entire cost of the comparison.

Your $5 welcome credit covers about 2,495 of these.

Which should you pick?

For long documents, Qwen3 Coder Flash has the largest context window here — 1M tokens.

On price, Qwen3 Coder Flash is the cheapest of the two on a typical task, at about 0.2¢.

If you want to watch the model think, Trinity Large Thinking shows reasoning; the other answers directly.

Or don’t pick. Send the identical prompt to all both, read the answers side by side, and keep the winner. How to run a fair bake-off →

Trinity Large Thinking pricing →Qwen3 Coder Flash pricing →Add Lyria 3 Clip Preview Add Grok 4.20

Questions, answered

Which is cheaper, Trinity Large Thinking or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

On a typical client proposal (5K tokens in, 800 out): Qwen3 Coder Flash at 0.2¢; Trinity Large Thinking at 0.2¢. Long prompts can change the order when long-context rates apply.

Which has the largest context window?

Qwen3 Coder Flash — 1M tokens, about 1,400 pages.

Can I run Trinity Large Thinking and Qwen3 Coder Flash side by side on Alyph?

Yes — that is what Alyph is built for: the identical prompt with identical context to all 2, answers rendered side by side, billed from one wallet. This exact combination costs about 0.41¢ for a typical task.

Ask both at once

Identical prompt, identical context, answers side by side — about 0.41¢ for a typical client proposal. Free to start, with $5 of credit.